kongsted » 25 Oct 2012, 08:56 skrev:Det er bare at se muligheder.
* Spånplade produktion
* Generel møbel produktion.
* Erstatning for flis, som ukrudtsbekæmpelse rundt om træer.
Bare kom med flere - kun fantasien sætter grænser (husk stadig :
http://heatball.de/ )
Det er jo ikke _produktet_ de beskatter, "kun" hensigten/formålet med produktet. Diesel er også billigere for fiskere mv. fordi de har et andet formål.
//Kongsted
totalt grineren med heatballs:
Varmekuglen har 95% effiktivivtet, under brug afgiver varmekuglen dog en utilsigtet ståling af lys i det synlige spektrum. Lyset er uskadeligt.
sakset fra siden:
By using heatballs, the heating effort of a normal house is effectively assisted. A heatball is a source of heat. Or do you use your toaster as a desk lamp?
By consulting the definition of terms for light bulbs in the EU-Regulation regarding "ecodesign requirements for non-directional household lamps" (COMMISSION REGULATION No 244/2009 of 18 March 2009), it becomes quite clear that a HEATBALL cannot possibly be regarded as a lamp:
"lamp" means a source made in order to produce an optical radiation, usually visible, including any additional components necessary for starting, power supply or stable operation of the lamp or for the distribution, filtering or transformation of the optical radiation, in case those components cannot be removed without permanently damaging the unit;
Real HEATBALLS are used to heat and are not as such lamps.
Caution! The surface of a HEATBALL during its use and shortly thereafter is very hot and can cause painful burns.
The same safety advice for light bulbs has to be adhered to for the HEATBALL.
During its use as a heater, HEATBALLS have an unavoidable emission of light in the visible spectrum. This light is harmless and cannot be used as a reason for reclamation.
http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexU ... 016:EN:PDF